Craig is a trusted legal and business advisor to companies facing complex, high-stakes disputes. For more than three decades, he has partnered with clients to navigate bet-the-company litigation, class actions, and other critical matters in courts across the United States and internationally. Clients rely on Craig not only for courtroom advocacy, but for clear judgment, strategic foresight, and practical solutions aligned with their business objectives.
Craig represents clients in a broad range of commercial and complex litigation matters, including disputes involving fiduciary duties, minority shareholder rights, fraud and misrepresentation, antitrust issues, wage and hour claims, consumer protection statutes, and other state and federal regulatory regimes. He is frequently called upon when the stakes are highest and the path forward requires both legal precision and sound business judgment.
A significant part of Craig’s practice focuses on intellectual property and unfair competition litigation. He helps businesses protect the proprietary information and relationships that drive enterprise value, including through the enforcement of restrictive covenants and the prosecution and defense of trade secret misappropriation claims nationwide. His experience includes designing and implementing restrictive covenant enforcement programs for national companies, handling expedited proceedings, and obtaining injunctive relief when timing is critical.
Craig also has extensive experience in product liability litigation, advising manufacturers and distributors on risk management and defending claims involving a wide array of products—from aviation components and industrial equipment to consumer and recreational products. He is valued for his ability to master technical issues, manage complex expert evidence, and present clear, persuasive narratives to judges and juries.
Craig’s work has been consistently recognized by leading peer-reviewed and industry publications, including:
- Chambers USA
- The Best Lawyers in America
- Missouri & Kansas Super Lawyers
- The Kansas City Business Journal
He has also been named one of the Top 500 Leading Litigators in America by Lawdragon and a Missouri Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation.
Honors and Recognition
Craig’s work has earned sustained recognition from leading legal directories, peer-reviewed publications, and professional organizations. These honors reflect both the depth of his litigation experience and the trust he has built with clients and peers over decades of practice.
- Chambers USA Senior Statesman, 2025, Business & Commercial Litigation, Trade Secret Litigation “Chambers-ranked for 22 years”
- Chambers USA, Chambers Tier 1 Rank 2003 – 2024 “Chambers-ranked for 20 years running”
- Missouri Lawyers Media POWER List/Business Defense, 2021 – 2026
- Missouri Lawyers Weekly ICON Award, 2022 – award recognizes strong leaders in law who have demonstrated notable, sustained success
- Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America, 2006
- Best Lawyers in America, 2009-2019
- America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators, 2018 and 2019
- Midwest Innocence Project, Advisory Board Member
- Missouri Super Lawyers (many years)
- Benchmark Litigation — Litigation Star
- Lawdragon 500 Leading Trial Lawyers in America
- Super Lawyers (multiple years)
- Kansas City Business Journal — Best of the Bar (multiple years)
- American Board of Trial Advocates
Selected Case Experience
Below is a representative selection of cases and matters reflecting Craig’s experience in complex commercial litigation, intellectual property disputes, fiduciary duty claims, real estate disputes, and high-stakes trial work. Matters shown in bold indicate cases tried or arbitrated.
- 2026 – Precision Additive v Buchok – defended misappropriation of trade secrets dispute, winning plaintiff’s agreement to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice
- 2026 – Hawks Note Purchase, LLC v Valor Residential Group LLC and VRG Management, LLC – Action for conversion, unjust enrichment and tortious interference with contract arising out of collection of $800,000 in rents as part of a $25 million real estate investment dispute – bench trial interrupted by interlocutory appeal of ruling denying enforcement of mandatory arbitration provision
- 2026 – LifeScience Technologies v Mercy Health and Myia – Working with a team from Bryan Cave, defending Mercy from claims of breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, and prosecuting a counterclaim against LST for abuse of process – LST claims damages of $90 million against Mercy and Myia
- 2025 – American Eldercare, Inc. v John Rubenstein et al. – Lead trial counsel on breach of fiduciary duty case to prosecute minority limited partner oppression claims in a real estate partnership owning a $200 million real estate portfolio
- 2025 – In the Matter of the Guardianship of Clayton R. Trysla, a cognitively impaired adult person – lead trial counsel on highly contested guardianship following contentious divorce
- 2021 – Alexsam, Inc v UMB Financial Corp – joined defense team as trial counsel in patent infringement case anticipating quick trial in Eastern District of Texas rocket docket – mediation before Dallas mediator Hesha Abrams resulted in favorable resolution of the case
- 2020 – Carrizosa v The Republic of Colombia – co-counsel in international arbitration case against Colombia involving hundreds of millions in damage claims under the ICSID Convention – case tried before a three-judge international tribunal
- 2010-2019 – Grant Thornton tax shelter litigation – defended Grant Thornton in a number of lawsuits alleging improper use of tax avoidance strategies
- 2016 – Coulter v Grant Thornton – lead counsel defending $25 million claim for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and negligence arising out of tax avoidance strategies
- 2015 – United States v Esquivel – Criminal defense of international sports executive indicted in Eastern District of NY – global coordinating counsel on legal team spanning three continents on extradition, detention, asset-seizures and related issues
- 2015 – Howard v Ferrellgas – defended breach of contract and fraud claims in a putative class action – bench trial resulted in enforcement of arbitration clause and plaintiffs then dismissed the lawsuit
- 2013 – Turnberry Associates (Jeff Soffer) v Starwood Vacation Ownership – defended breach of fiduciary duty case claiming $40M in damages – court granted motion for summary judgment during pretrial arguments before anticipated six week trial
- 2012 – Garcia, et al v Tyson Foods – federal and state wage and hour class action – three week jury trial on $44 million claim resulted in verdict awarding plaintiffs $502,000
- 2010 – Patrick Earley d/b/a Tantara Trust v Wachovia Bank – defended lender liability claim arising out Plaintiff’s efforts to finance an 80% stake on a $938 million high end office property – Wachovia prevailed on motion for summary judgment resolving all issues in its favor
- 2006– Speednet v Sprint Spectrum – lawsuit involved the validity of Sprint’s Right of First Refusal provision in a spectrum license covering parts of Michigan – bench trial resulted in injunctive relief affirming Sprint’s contract rights; affirmed by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 2003 – World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) v Lewmar – contribution claim by WWE arising out of $18M settlement paid to widow of WWE wrestler Owen Hart, who died in an accident during a performance in May 1999 – four week jury trial against Lewmar resulted in $9M settlement on claim for contribution
- 2003 – Barnett v Life Insurance Investors Company of America – lead counsel for Defendant Life Insurance Investors Company of America. Won summary judgment in federal court in Kansas; court held the life insurance policy of Barnett had been cancelled by mutual consent.
- 2002 – Sprint (Transworld Wireless TV) v NACEPF – case involved competing offers for Sprint’s ITFS spectrum capacity in Spokane, WA– AAA arbitration hearing in Washington, DC resulted in ruling affirming Sprint’s contract rights as superior
- 2001– Fairway Pyramid Associates v BRT Realty Trust– defended fraud claims alleging concealment of asbestos in connection with sale of commercial office building – jury trial resulted in verdict of $81,000 on plaintiff’s $7.4M claim
- 2001 – Hoehn, McKee and other shareholders of LICO/ASI v Columbus McKinnon – $155M corporate acquisition gave rise to $15 million claim against sellers; represented sellers claiming $5M being held in escrow – jury trial resulted in verdict releasing $5.8M escrow
- 1999– Sanford v Ektelon and UVEX– defended product liability claims concerning protective eyewear for racquetball players– jury trial resulted verdict for 30% of pretrial settlement demand
- 1998 – First AUSA Life Insurance Co (Aegon) v KCSI – represented plaintiffs in breach of fiduciary duty/tax indemnity – jury trial resulted in verdict exceeding $3M
- 1998 – City of Joplin v Baird, Kurtz & Dobson – prosecuted audit malpractice case, recovering $3.5 million on a $4.5 million claim
- 1997 – Ryan Sayles v Vancom – defended Vancom in wrongful death case arising from death of Ryan Sayles when his coat string caught on the bus hand-rail door and he was dragged under the bus and killed – complex mediation resulted in $14M settlement
- 199_ – Ferrellgas v Inergy and Ron Boster – lawsuit to enforce restrictive covenant and non-compete agreement in propane industry – bench trial resulted in enforcement of a nationwide two-year employment restriction
- 1996 – Norsk Hydro (Hydro Aluminium) v Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. – breach of contract and tortious interference case involving $15 million of aluminum ingots
- 1996 – U.S. ex rel. Burns & Richter v Hensel Phelps Construction Co. – successfully defended qui tam action arising out of design and construction of Naval Ordinance Station in Louisville, KY
- 199_ – Ferrellgas v Robert Wikse – lawsuit to alleging inevitable misappropriation of trade secrets surrounding a “keep-dry” contract with a major petroleum refinery – bench trial resulted in initial grant of a TRO and subsequent denial of preliminary injunction
- 1995 – Rinehart v City of Independence – defended employment wrongful discharge claim – jury trial resulted in defense verdict
- 1994 – Zamaitis v Harmon Industries – employment ADA jury trial
- 1994 – Harmon Industries v Dallas Area Rapid Transit Association – construction dispute; bid protest alleging DART’s exclusion of Harmon from bidding process was arbitrary and capricious 1994 – arbitration hearing resulted in ruling denying Harmon’s protest
- 1994 – AFTRA Local 213 v Bernstein-Rein Advertising Company – labor arbitration involving claim of $1.5M in back pay based on breach of collective bargaining agreement – arbitration award affirmed amount BR admitted it owed, which was less than 5% of damages claimed
- 1994 – Citizens State Bank v Shearson Lehman Brothers – fraud case jury trial
- 1993 – Katz v Bernstein-Rein Advertising Co. – defended fraudulent inducement and breach of contract – jury trial ended in directed verdict for defendant
- 1993 – Barnard v KCSI – represented plaintiff in shareholder dispute involving breach of “put” agreement – two week jury trial resulted in $6.3M verdict
- 1992 – Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v The Equitable Life Assurance Society – defended constructive eviction claim and prosecuted a counter-claim for breach of a 10 year lease of substantial office space – settlement resulted in Ohio Casualty paying Equitable $1.3M
- 1991 – Wulfing v KCSI – represented plaintiff in shareholder dispute involving breach of “put” agreement – four week jury trial resulted in six figure verdict
- 1990 – Vinylplex v Goodrich – $5M breach of contract claim for overpricing in violation of a most favored nations pricing provision – jury trial resulted in $4M (actually, exactly one penny less than $4M) settlement
- 1988 – Vinylplex v Goodrich – Goodrich terminated PVC resin supply to pipe manufacturer in Pittsburg, KS, eliminating 53 jobs – bench trial on preliminary injunction resulted in mandatory injunction ordering reinstatement of resin supply and saving the company
- 1985 – Emerick v Mutual Benefit Life – represented Emerick on breach of contract, fraud and conversion claims – jury trial resulted in $8.25M verdict
- 1984 – C&H Sugar v KC Terminal Warehouse – prosecuted claims for negligence, breach of contract and fraud in connection with a cockroach infestation at the Kansas City warehouse – jury trial resulted in $500,000 verdict and award of $113,000 in prejudgment interest
- 1983 – Hyatt Skywalk litigation – case arose out of the July 1981 collapse of the skywalks in the Hyatt Hotel, resulting in deaths of 114 people; eighteen months after graduation from law school, represented the 14 Hyatt Skywalk defendants as solo trial counsel in a claim by one of the victims for post-traumatic stress disorder – one week jury trial resulted in plaintiff accepting, just before closing arguments, the settlement offer the Skywalk defendants made, and she had then rejected, responding with a settlement demand ten times as large
Craig’s practice is intentionally focused. He works directly with clients, remains personally involved in each matter, and brings the perspective of decades spent resolving disputes where the stakes are real and the consequences lasting.